EFL STUDENTS ENGAGEMENT IN SOCIAL NETWORK SITE- BASED LEARNING

Sri Yunita, Yustika Nur Fajriah, Susilawati Susilawati

Abstract


Online learning is a choice to use in this current pedagogy. The most prominent power in online learning is the wide room for teachers to develop students engagement during the learning process. This study aims to figure out how students are engaged in online learning, to describe and examine in depth how they are engaging themselves in the online learning. This study employs a case study. The data were obtained from a collection of students chat and discussion in SNS. The data were obtained by observation, questionnaires and interviews. Observation data and questionnaires were analyzed by using Dixsons (2010, 2015) students engagement theory, which incorporates six engagement behaviors. As the analysis procedure, students chats and interview were analyzed inductively (Cresswell, 2012). The result shown that most of students were engaged in the online learning through the SNS application. Specifically, the engagement shown by the students to this simple application indicates that the impact of online learning on the students engagement is not determined by whether the platform used is high- or low.


Keywords


online learning; student engagement; SNS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbari, E., Naderi, A., Simons, R. J., & Pilot, A. (2016). Student engagement and foreign language learning through online social networks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0006-7

Ali, M. M., & Hassan, N. (2018). Defining concepts of student engagement and factors contributing to their engagement in schools. Creative Education, 09(14), 21612170. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.914157

Andrews, R., Freeman, A., Hou, D., McGuinn, N., Robinson, A., & Zhu, J. (2007). The effectiveness of information and communication technology on the learning of written English for 5- To 16-year-olds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 325336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00628.x

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303

Artino Jr, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(34), 146151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001

Bates, T. (2005). Technology, e-learning, and distance education. Routledge.

Berge, Z. L. (2002). Active, interactive, and reflective elearning. The Quaterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 181190.

Blakey, C. H., & Major, C. H. (2019). Student perceptions of engagement in online courses: An exploratory study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 22(4).

Bodily, R., Graham, C., & Bush, M. (2017). Online learner engagement: Opportunities and challenges with using data analytics. Educational Technology, 57(1), 1018.

ankaya, S., Durak, G., & Ynkl, E. (2013). Using educational social networking sites in higher education: edmodo through the lenses of undergraduate students. European Journal of Educational Technology, 1(1), 323.

Clark, R. K., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction. Pleiffer.

Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Dahalan, N., Hassan, H., & Atan, H. (2012). Student engagement in online learning: Learners attitude toward e-mentoring. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67(November 2011), 464475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.351

Deschaine, M. E., & Whale, D. E. (2017). Increasing student engagement in online educational leadership courses. Journal of Educators Online, 14(1).

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

Dixson, M. D. (2010a). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 10(2), 113. http://ezproxy.deakin.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=52225431&site=eds-live&scope=site

Dixson, M. D. (2010b). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 10(2), 113.

Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/OLJ.V19I4.561

Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2007). How to teach English with technology. Pearson Education Limited.

Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z

Ekwunife-Orakwue, K. C. V., & Teng, T.-L. (2014). The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments. Computers & Education, 78(September 2014), 414427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.011

Erben, T., Ban, R., & Castaeda, M. (2009). Teaching English language learners through technology. Routledge.

Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x

Fletcher, A. (2007). Defining student engagement: A literature review.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 723. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

Gilbert, B. (2015). Online learning revealing the benefits and challenges. St. John Fisher College.

Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192

Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12235

Hu, M., & Li, H. (2017). Student engagement in online learning: A review. 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology, 3943. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2017.17

Hu, Min, & Li, H. (2017). Student engagement in online learning: A review. 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), 3943. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2017.17

Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, April, 170179. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330

Kong, Q.-P., Wong, N.-Y., & Lam, C.-C. (2003). Student engagement in Mathematics: Development of instrument and validation of construct. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 421.

Kuh, G. D. (2003). What were learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 2432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380309604090

Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2006). Personality types and learners interaction in web-based threaded discussion. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(1), 8394.

Liao, H. L., & Lu, H. . (2008). The role of experience and innovation characteristics in the adoption and continued use of e-learning websites. Computers & Education, 51(4), 14051416. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.006

Louwrens, N., & Hartnett, M. (2015). Student and teacher perceptions of online student engagement in an online middle school. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 19(1), 2744.

Mandernach, B. J. (2009). Three ways to improve student engagement in the online classroom. Online Classroom, 3, 12.

Messias, I., Morgado, L., & Barbas, M. (2015). Students engagement in distance learning: Creating a scenario with LMS and social network aggregation. 2015 International Symposium on Computers in Education, SIIE 2015, November, 4449. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE.2015.7451646

Meyer, K. A. (2014). Student engagement in online learning: What works and why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.20018

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A system view (2nd ed.). Thomson Wadsworth.

Mller, T. (2008). Persistence of women in online degree-completion programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 118.

Newby, T. J., Stepich, D. A., Lehman, J. D., & Russell, J. D. (2006). Educational technology for teaching and learning (3rd ed.). Merrill/Prentice-Hall.

Nguyen, V. A. (2017). The impact of online learning activities on student learning outcome in blended learning course. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 16(04). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/S021964921750040X

Northrup, P. T. (2002). Online learners preferences for interaction. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 219226.

Rajabalee, B. Y., Santally, M. I., & Rennie, F. (2020). A study of the relationship between students engagement and their academic performances in an eLearning environment. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(1), 120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2042753019882567

Rank, T., Warren, C., & Millum, T. (2011). Teaching English using ICT: a practical guide for secondary school teachers. Continuum.

Reading, C. (2008). Recognising and measuring engagement in ICT-rich learning environments. In ACT on ICT: Australian Computers on Education Conference Proceedings, 419425.

Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175

Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In C. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7

Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). No Title. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 101109. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109

Saad, R. G., Kira, D., Mak, T., & Nebebe, F. (2017). Anxiety & performance in online learning. Proceedings of the Informing Science + Information Technology Education Conference, 147157. http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3736

Sakulwichitsintu, S., Colbeck, D., Ellis, L., & Turner, P. (2015). Online-peer learning: what influences the students learning experience. Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies: Advanced Technologies for Supporting Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning (ICALT 2015), 205207. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2015.122

Sangr, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(2), 145159. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1161

Seethamraju, R. (2014). Effectiveness of using online discussion forum for case study analysis. Education Research International, 110.

Silius, K., Miilumki, T., Huhtamki, J., Tebest, T., Merilineri, J., & Pohjolainen, S. (2010). Social media enhanced studying and learning in higher education. 2010 IEEE Education Engineering Conference, EDUCON 2010, 137143. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492586

Smith, D. C., Ito, A., Gruenewald, J., & Yeh, H. L. (2010). Promoting school engagement: Attitudes toward school among American and Japanese youth. Journal of School Violence, 9, 392406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2010.509308

Stein, S. J., Shephard, K., & Harris, I. (2011). Conceptions of e?learning and professional development for e?learning held by tertiary educators in New Zealand. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 145165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00997.x

Sun, J. C.-Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and selfregulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8535.2010.01157.x

Wang, M. Te, & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 3139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x

Weimer, M. (2016). More student engagement strategies.

Wilson, D., & Smilanich, E. (2005). The other blended learning. Pleiffer Publishing.

Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 1525.

You, J. W., & Kang, M. (2014). The role of academic emotions in the relationship between perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning. Computers & Education, 77, 125133. https://doi.org/https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.018

Young, S., & Bruce, M. A. (2011). Classroom community and student engagement in online courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 219230.

Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379680




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34001/edulingua.v8i2.2048

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 415 times
PDF - 182 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


7 moraref5 BASe7 moraref3 Garuda1 Google Scholar

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.

Edulingua