THE PERFORMANCE OF LMS USE AND ITS IMPACT ON ENGLISH LEARNING OUTCOMES

Hefri Asra Omika

Abstract


Learning management systems (LMS) are strong integrated systems that help teachers and students complete a range of tasks during the online learning process. For three semesters, the SMAN Titian Teras twelfth graders have used LMS Moodle to learn English. This study aims to (1) describe the accomplishment of twelfth-grade students' online English learning activities using LMS Moodle; (2) identify differences in twelfth-grade students' English learning outcomes based on LMS Moodle performance, and (3) identify differences in twelfth-grade students' English learning outcomes based on gender. The population of this research is grade 12 students of SMA Negeri Titian Teras H. Abdurrahman Sayoeti in the academic year 2021/2022, totaling 336 students. The sampling method used was simple random sampling, based on the Slovin formula, 182 students were assigned as the research sample. Data collection instruments used in this study: (1) Moodle log data which shows student performance in learning using LMS Moodle; and (2) computer-based semester exam results data on English subjects. Analysis of performance data using the LMS Moodle using the Sum Activity Rating (SAR) instrument developed by Singh et al. The statistical test used in this study is the Mann-Whitney U Test. The results showed that the level of achievement of the twelfth-grade students' English learning activities was high (84.3%). The English learning outcomes of students who have high LMS usage performance are better than students who have low LMS usage performance. English learning outcomes of female students are better than male students.


Keywords


LMS Performance; Moodle log; English Learning Outcome;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alias, N. A., & Zainuddin, A. M. (2005). Innovation for Better Teaching and Learning : Adopting the Learning Management System. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(2), 27–40.

Altun, A., Gulbahar, Y., & Madran, O. (2008). Use of a content management system for blended learning: Perceptions of pre-service teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(4), 138–153.

Amer, A., & Daher, W. (2019). Moodle quizzes as a teaching tool in English for academic purposes course. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 25(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2019.096513

Bošković, V., Tomic, I., & Gajic, T. (2014). Moodle in English Language Teaching. SINTEZA Internet and Education, 480–483. https://doi.org/10.15308/sinteza-2014-480-483

Broadbent, J. (2016). Academic success is about self-efficacy rather than the frequency of use of the learning management system. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2634

Butova, A. V., Dubskikh, A. I., Kisel, O. V., & Chigintseva, E. G. (2019). Electronic Educational Environment Moodle in English Language Training Anna. 14(2), 47–55.

Conde, M. Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Rodríguez-Conde, M. J., Alier, M., Casany, M. J., & Piguillem, J. (2014). An evolving Learning Management System for new educational environments using 2.0 tools. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745433

Despotović-Zrakić, M., Marković, A., Bogdanović, Z., Barać, D., &, & Krčo, S. (2017). Providing Adaptivity in Moodle LMS Courses. Journal, Source Supported, Technology, 15(1).

Dimopoulos, I., Petropoulou, O., Boloudakis, M., & Retalis, S. (2013). Using Learning Analytics in Moodle for assessing students ’ performance. 2nd Moodle Research Conference, 4–6. http://research.moodle.net/pluginfile.php/15/mod_data/content/1489/Using Learning Analytics in Moodle....pdf

Firat, M. (2016). Determining the effects of lms learning behaviors on academic achievement from a learning analytic perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15(2016), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.28945/3405

Główka, D. (2014). The impact of gender on attainment in learning English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 617. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.4.3

Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : A Closer Look at Learning Strategies , L2 Proficiency, and Gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261–297.

Jo, I. H., Yu, T., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2015). Relations between student online learning behavior and academic achievement in higher education: A learning analytics approach. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, 9783662441879, 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_38

Jurubescu, T. (2008). Learning Content Management Systems. Revista Informatica Economică, 2(4), 85–88.

Kasim, N. N. M., & Khalid, F. (2016). Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the higher education institution context: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644

Omika, H. A. (2022). The Effect of Math Anxiety on Boarding School Students’ Mathematics Learning Outcomes during Online Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 55(3).

Omika, H. A., Marzal, J., & Idrus, A. (2023). Development of Computer-Based Tests using Moodle LMS on the Material of Social Conflict and Integration Pengembangan Soal Berbasis Komputer dengan LMS Moodle Pada Materi Konflik dan Integrasi Sosial. 14(01), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.26418/j-psh.v14i1.59903

Prasetya, R. E. (2021). Effectiveness of Teaching English for Specific Purposes in LMS Moodle : Lecturers ’ Perspective. Journal of English Language Teaching and …, 6(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v6i1.498

Robbins, S. L. (1995). The Study of Second Language Acquisition by Rod Ellis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1994. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/l461005209

Rotelli, D., & Monreale, A. (2021). Making Sense of Moodle Log Data. 2019, 1–14. http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.11071

Shannon, L.-J. Y., & Rice, M. (2017). Scoring the Open Source Learning Management Systems. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(6), 432–436. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.6.907

Singh, K. K., Kumar, U., & Anurupam, K. (2019). Activity Based Students’ Performance Measure Using Moodle Log Files. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, 7(7), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.32622/ijrat.77201901

Surjono, H. D., Muhtadi, A., & Trilisiana, N. (2019). The effects of online activities on student learning outcomes in blended learning environment. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345120.3345167

Whitmer, J. C. (2013). Logging On to Improve Achievement: Evaluating the Relationship between Use of the Learning Management System, Student Characteristics, and Academic Achievement in a Hybrid Large Enrollment Undergraduate Course. In ProQuest LLC.

Yang, J. C., & Quadir, B. (2018). Individual differences in an English learning achievement system: gaming flow experience, gender differences, and learning motivation. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 27(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1460618

Zoghi, M., Kazemi, S. A., & Kalani, A. (2013). The Effect of Gender on Language Learning. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 2(4), 1124–1128. http://jnasci.org/special-4/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34001/edulingua.v10i1.3646

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 103 times
PDF - 87 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


7 moraref5 BASe7 moraref3 Garuda1 Google Scholar

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.

Edulingua